I read my first Bill Bryson book back in
the 1990s.It was his excellent book on Britain,
written from an American perspective: Notes from a Small Island - a definitive
classic of the expat writing genre, in my opinion.
Being a contrarian by nature, I had
resisted reading the best-seller for a number of months beforehand, despite many
friends raving about it, but once I succumbed to Bryson, I was hooked.
Maybe I overdosed and read too much Bill,
because later, I kind of went off him a little.Why?I think it was mainly
because I became a little weary of his humour, which although very clever and
witty most of the time, can seem a little contrived occasionally.
Anyway, I was thinking about Bill Bryson a couple
of weeks back and I remembered that he had moved back to the US for a
time.I couldn’t help wondering if he’d
written anything about his time back in the States.Lo and behold, I discovered there’s a book by
him called: Notes from a Big Country (published in the US as:
I'm a Stranger Here Myself).As the
title implies, it’s about him trying to readjust to US culture
and everyday life after spending 20 years in the UK.I forgot any previous misgivings and ordered
a second hand copy of the book straightaway.
I loved the book and my admiration for Bill
was reborn!Having been writing an expat
blog for a year and a half now, it really makes me appreciate the challenges of
the genre and I have enormous respect how Bryson tackles them.He has a knack of hitting on some of the main
issues for the ‘foreigner abroad’ and condensing them into a few very readable
pages, with some great insights and humour mixed in – and he makes it all seem
effortless (though I’m sure that it’s not).
His chapter on the differences between
attitudes to humour in the US and UK was
excellent, for instance.It’s a topic
that I’ve tackled myself and found difficult to encapsulate it all in a few
hundred words.Bill seemed to take the
entire range of essentials and boil it down to few pages, something I might
have deemed impossible if I’d not seen it done. There are insights, witticisms, quotes,
cultural context, personal anecdotes - all put together in a flowing, easy
style.
There are other great writers out there, of
course, but my big respect for Bill Bryson has been reborn!
One of the advantages of living in Florida in
election season is that the Romneys and the Obamas are always coming around,
trying to woo everyone into voting for them!
This is because Florida is a swing
state (George W Bush won it by just 543 votes in 2000!) and has a very varied
population, even for the United States.In Florida you’ll find
Cuban exiles, retired Jewish Americans, Mexican immigrants, traditional "cracker"
types, African Americans, Scientologists, and there are even some British
expats, I’ve heard!It’s like a US
Noah’s Ark, with two of every type of American (and others) crammed into a
hot, steamy, swampy flat peninsula.Okay, maybe I am going too far now.But you get the message.
The bottom line is that the first lady,
Michelle Obama came to town this Monday and my wife managed to get some tickets
for us to go and see her talk at a rally!
It was all rather exciting and took a bit
of organizing, as my wife had to leave work early, and we had a tennis practice
straight after.A further annoying
complication was that it was a very popular event and so we couldn’t find
anywhere to park on the day within a mile of the university venue.
Eventually, after driving around for about
twenty five minutes and getting more and more desperate, we managed to find a
metered parking space that allowed us 2 hours grace in return for a wallet full
of dimes and quarters.
Consequently, we arrived at the venue later
than we’d planned.After negotiating the
airport-style security, we gained entrance - but having arrived late, we were
shunted into seats at the rear end of the indoor stadium.It meant that for the most part we were
viewing Michelle from the rear and had to view the big screens to see her face
when she spoke.
But she is a good speaker with charisma,
who projects and induces a lot of warmth.Her talk wasn’t so much about trying to convert the unconvinced, but
more of a rallying cry to the troops.Michelle has wide appeal, but she is also a particular heroine of
African-American womanhood and they were out in force.
The indoor stadium was packed!
Not the best view of Michelle - but at least there were large screens to watch!
After the talk, we headed back to the
car.We were well within the 2 hour
parking period and feeling rather buoyed up by the talk until we reached the
car and discovered that we had a parking citation stuffed under the windscreen
wiper.We’d been booked for facing the
car against the stream of traffic, a petty offence for sure, and ordered to pay
a 30 dollar fine!
Trying not to let it spoil our evening, we
tried to forget the fine and went to practice our tennis.It wasn’t until we arrived home that I
switched on my computer and discovered the news about the secretly recorded
video of Mitt Romney, where at a private fundraiser, he seemed to imply that
47% of Americans were dependent on government handouts and that they would vote
for Barak Obama regardless of what Mitt said or did, so Mitt didn’t care about
them.
The Romney scandal seemed big.It was like he’d self-destructed.It almost felt like the election was over
before it had even really begun.
This is my first presidential election
since I moved to the US.I have followed previous
ones from the UK, but in some ways the perspective is a little different being
here.I generally voted for the Lib Dems
(Centrist) or the Labour party (Centre-left) back in the UK, so my sympathies
tend towards the Democrats here, but I will try to be as objective as I can
(which is impossible, I know!).
The
candidates
I think it’s fair to say that neither of
the main candidates is super-popular with their own party.For many Democrats, Obama has been a big
disappointment after all the hope and optimism generated during his 2008
campaign.For the Republicans, Romney is
essentially a compromise candidate, the least offensive option for the various
factions that make up the GOP, and one that few in the party particularly seem
to love.
The general atmosphere of the political
campaigns is less positive than 2008.Their approach seems to reflect the above, in some ways, with each
candidate putting forward a message to the voters, which often seems to imply:
“You think I’m bad?Take a look at the
other guy!”
The
most memorable parts of the two conventions
This will probably seem shallow to some,
but the thing that I will probably remember most about the Republican
convention was the Clint Eastwood speech, where he addressed an empty chair,
with the conceit being that an imaginary Obama was sitting in it.Although the idea may not have appeared to be
a bad one on paper, the reality of Eastwood’s speech delivered a level of
absurdity that wouldn’t have seemed out of place in a Monty Python sketch.It was a gift to American satirists too, of
course.
The actual serious political speeches at
the RNC were on the whole, very competent, but the atmosphere generally seemed
a little flat, probably for the reasons I outlined earlier – Romney is
respected but not loved by his party.
The most memorable thing about the Democratic
convention for me was the Bill Clinton speech.It was gripping, and quite simply a master class in political oration - Clinton has without
doubt, a slippery and sleazy side to his character, but wow, what a speaker!
The downside to the Bill Clinton speech, of
course, was that it reminded you what a genius Clinton was and is,
when it comes to the Dark Arts of political strategy, tactics and delivery, and
by implication, what a mediocre figure that Obama can seem in comparison
sometimes.
Other
thoughts
One thing that made a big impact on me was
the very different make-up of the audiences at the two conventions.I have to say that the RNC crowd seemed to be
drawn from a narrower demographic – they were older, whiter, and more male
generally, whereas the DNC audience appeared younger and much more diverse in
their makeup and backgrounds.(One could
say something similar about the Conservative and Labour conference audiences in
the UK, of course, but in the US, the
difference seemed much starker).
The other thing that seemed a little odd
was that apart from Condoleezza Rice, there seemed to be no representatives of
the last Republican government at the RNC.
The most memorable problem for the
Democrats, of course, was the messy turnaround over them not including “God”
and “Jerusalem” in their platform, which caught the media and then public
attention.
General
summary
I must admit that for an old cynic like me,
political conferences can often fall a little short of the mark.I almost always find myself wanting less
gloss and more substance.Before the party
conventions, I naively hoped that I might find out a little more about what
Obama and Romney might actually do if they won the presidency - there was lots
of rhetoric, but precious little in terms of practical policies coming from
either of them.
One background factor that can also be
somewhat disconcerting is the overall atmosphere of rancor and acrimony that
possesses US politics at the moment.Modern
British politics can often be somewhat dull and flat (certainly since the
turmoil of the 1980s), because the three main UK parties tend to squabble over
the same piece of centre ground nowadays (things seem to have heated up a
little in the UK with the austerity cuts and a fracturing coalition government,
but it still seems mild compared to the situation across the Atlantic).In the US, however,
the Republicans and Democrats are polar opposites politically and passions can
sometimes spill over into a real sense of sourness.
Having said all that, one refreshing thing
about US politicians is their willingness to roll up their sleeves and get down
and with ‘the people’. British
politicians can sometimes appear stiff and aloof by comparison.The US
presidential elections are also unique and special to Americans as it’s the
only election they have where the entire nation participates.There is no real equivalent in a constitutional
monarchy/parliamentary democracy like the UK, where
the head of state is hereditary and the political leader is chosen by their own
political party.