Writing a blog about being a Brit in the US, my mind often
goes back to the expat Americans that I’ve known living in England over the
years. So I thought I’d dedicate this
post to by far the most colourful character I’ve been friends with, the
poet, Lyman Andrews, who had a creative and non-conventional
approach to life (often fueled by alcohol).
When I knew him, he was an American Studies lecturer, but he'd also worked as a poetry critic at the
Sunday Times, through which he met literary luminaries such as William
Burroughs and Allen Ginsburg, as well as partying with pop stars, such as Mick Jagger and Ray
Davies from The Kinks, plus he served as a witness at one of Britain's biggest obscenity trials of the 1960s.
Lyman in Denver 1979 (photo courtesy of Michael Baird: See comments!) |
I met Lyman during my second year of university, when I was
studying Philosophy at Leicester. I was
staying in student accommodation, a shared house of ten people. Most of us had lived there the previous year,
but there were a few new tenants, Lyman being one of them.
It was somewhat surprising to have a middle-aged lecturer
move in with us, the rest of us were generally in our late teens or early
twenties and undergrads or post grads.
It gradually came out that Lyman had previously been sharing a rented
property with his boyfriend, but the relationship had broken down. Lyman had continued to live there on his own
for a time, but a burglary had made him nervous about staying in the property. Further complicating the matter was Lyman’s
heavy drinking, which always added a layer of chaos to his personal life. So he had approached the university
authorities and said he’d needed a place to live, and they had put him into
university accommodation with us.
I suspect that they chose our house because we already had a
reputation for drunkenness and had received numerous official warnings for
rowdy behaviour. I think they assumed
that we wouldn’t object to one more crazy person, which on the whole was
correct. Although the university authorities,
being of an older generation, seemed even more concerned by Lyman’s sexuality than
his drinking and antics (he was bisexual, but tended more towards homo than
hetero). Lyman’s sexuality wasn’t really
much of a concern to us, with the exception of the Methodist who lived on the
bottom floor, who told us that he prayed regularly for Lyman to be cured of his
homosexuality (Lyman found this hilarious, rather than patronizing).
From Denver to the
Sunday Times
Lyman was born and raised near Denver, Colorado, and would
often relate with affection stories of hunting with his father when young. Despite the homosexual stereotype, Lyman was
in not effeminate in any way, if anything, he veered to the opposite – he expressed
a dislike for effeminate homosexuals, relating far more to the very masculine
writer, Ernest Hemingway, who was one of his great heroes. Apart from his father, the only other family
member who I ever heard him mention was his sister, who he managed to maintain
contact with over the years, despite very infrequent trips back to the USA.
Lyman studied at Berkley and then crossed the pond to study
at King’s College, London. It was during
the late 60s and early 70s that he had his poetry collections, including his
most respected, Kaleidoscope,
published. He effectively achieved a
great deal of artistic success at a young age, although sadly, he would
never again reach those creative heights.
He used his creative and academic success to carve out an academic
career for himself, however, teaching American Studies in Leicester, and
working for many years as a poetry critic for The Sunday Times.
Lyman reading in Yugoslavia 1960s |
The Sunday Times
Period
The 1960s and 70s was an interesting and exciting period, as
far as culture goes, and at the Sunday Times, Lyman was notable for being one
of the first poetry critics to take popular song lyrics seriously, an example being
the well-crafted songs of The Kinks – this seems uncontroversial nowadays, but
was revolutionary at the time. This meant
that he was often invited to backstage music parties (some of them pretty wild),
as well as the more formal events that might normally associate with a Times
poetry critic (he was asked to attend a royal garden party, for instance).
One of Lyman’s anecdote’s was how he “slept with Mick Jagger”. He'd say that to get your attention and then
explain that in truth, that he’d attended a drunken party, collapsed onto a bed
fully clothed and woken up with Jagger slept next to him.
Another of his anecdotes was when he first met William
Burroughs, he’d confused him for a waiter at the party after the Last
Exit to Brooklyn obscenity trial (see below) and requested a drink before realising his mistake (Burroughs
was dressed smartly in a dark suit and tie).
At another occasion to mark the release of a Kinks album, he
got into a drunken food fight with singer and lyricist, Ray Davies.
According to Lyman, his relationship with the Sunday Times eventually
soured when it was taken over by Rupert Murdoch. There was a lot of disquiet at the newspaper
at the time – for one thing the paper had a history of political neutrality and
Murdoch brought with him a reputation for conservatism, which many suspected
(rightly, it turned out) he would impose on the newspaper. Some of the journalists who resigned at that
time went on to form The Independent, but Lyman dropped out of writing for
newspapers altogether, as far as I am aware.
Witness at the Last
Exit to Brooklyn Obscenity Trial
Lyman’s poetry
publishers for his book, Kaleidoscope were Calder and Boyers, who were also the British publishers of the controversial novel, Last
Exit to Brooklyn, which ended up having obscenity charges brought against
it. It was one of the big literary trials
of the 1960s, as the old obscenity laws were being challenged, and Lyman was
asked to be a witness, defending the literary merits of the novel.
University of Leicester (via Wikimedia Commons) |
American Studies at
Leicester
Lyman had a reputation for outrageous behavior at Leicester
University. At a typical tutorial of
his, the students would be castigated (in a semi-humorous way) if they hadn’t brought
a bottle of wine along (even if it was morning) and someone would be given
money by Lyman and told to buy a bottle from a local shop to bring back, if they hadn't.
Lyman’s drinking would continue throughout the daytime and
usually continue in the Student Union Bar after classes were over. Normally by mid-evening he would be too drunk
to continue and head home. Usually he
would ask the bar staff to book a taxi and make his way home by himself, but
there were other times when he had to be physically carried from the building
by university security (no mean task as he’d put on a lot of weight by the time
he was middle-aged) and driven home.
Lyman almost always drank whisky in the bar and always did
his drinking in the daytime/early evening, almost never at night time – he said
that he didn’t like the rowdiness and loud noise. Aside from the university student union bar,
another favourite drinking place of his was the Magazine Pub (nicknamed affectionately, "The Mag"), now sadly
demolished, which was near the polytechnic.
Despite being a smart man with a passion and deep knowledge of
American Literature, Lyman’s relationship with the university authorities were
always bad in the time that I knew him in the late 1980s, thanks to his personal
behavior. The relationship teetered on
outright hostility and it was an open secret that the university powers would
be happy to see him gone (it didn’t help that Lyman would proposition students
when drunk too, invariably without success). Lyman himself, however, tended to see the
problems and his lack of popularity with the powers that be as amusing, generally
reveling in his rebellious reputation.
One time, according to Lyman, he attended a big university
function. Drunk, as usual, and sensing
that the university vice chancellor was cold-shouldering him, Lyman approached
the vice chancellor whilst he was in the middle of a conversation with important
patrons of the university, and declared in a loud voice: “Hey, it’s your puffy
American Studies lecturer, why are you ignoring me?” before promptly biting him
hard on his ear!
Reclusive in
Nottingham
Lyman’s problems with the university came to a head in the
late 1980s. Lyman negotiated his
departure through his trade union, however, and managed to get early retirement
with a decent pay off and pension. He
was very happy about the situation.
“This is what I’ve always dreamed of,” he told me, “a regular income and
time to work on my writing.” (Although,
how much writing he actually got done, however, I’m not sure of, I don’t think
he got anything published during this period).
After many years of living in Leicester, Lyman had come to
dislike the city. He considered it to be
mediocre and provincial. It’s hard to
separate his disdain toward Leicester, however, from his feelings towards the university
authorities, people who had pressured him for years and who he saw as small
minded.
He lived in London for a time after he left Leicester. All I remember was that it was a rather posh,
traditional public school sort of place with a large portrait of the guy who’d
founded the apartheid system in South Africa in the dining area (Lyman found
this terribly ironic and amusing). I still
feel a bit guilty, but it me who got him kicked out of there. I travelled down there with a friend on New
Years’ Eve. After socializing with Lyman
for a time, we wanted to go to Trafalger Square for the festivities, leaving
Lyman back at the flat (as I mentioned previously, Lyman hated too much rowdiness). He also told us specifically not to bring
anyone back (we were kipping in his small room), but after quite a few drinks
and a few hours in central London, I forgot what he’d said and brought back a
couple of women, who were looking for somewhere to stay. That was enough to get him kicked out.
Lyman spent his final years renting a room at a YMCA in
central Nottigham. He had barely enough
possessions to fill a small suitcase and no particular ties to anyone in
Nottingham. He seemed generally happy though,
when I visited him, working away on a novel and listening to Michael Crawford
singing Phantom of the Opera on his tape machine, smoking cigarettes and eating
hot buttered toast (“It’s one of the few things in life that never loses its
appeal, even sex can get boring”, he’d say).
My contact with Lyman stopped not long after I moved up to
Leeds. Years later, I looked him up on
the internet, curious to see if there was anything about him and if he was still
alive. Lyman didn’t do internet, but I
had email contact in 2005 with the artist, Paul O’Donovan, who wrote about
Lyman in the magazine, Interzone – he told
me that Lyman had had to give up drinking due to health reasons and due to the
passing of Marion Boyers, no longer had a publisher. I considered going down to visit Lyman, but
didn’t. He died on the February 13,
2009.
Lyman in his flat in Nottingham, late 80s, wearing his stars 'n' stripes cardigan (Photo taken by myself) |
Relationship with
England and the USA
I talked to Lyman a lot about his views on England and the
US in the years I knew him. His feelings
on both countries were complex and mixed.
As a Englishman living in Florida, I can understand his situation in some
ways. Lyman brought to the UK, a fresh
perspective from across the pond, which was interesting to people like me. But it works the other way too. Living in other countries also opens the mind
up to other ways of looking at things and makes you view your home country
differently. Not necessarily better or
worse, just differently.
Lyman could find English people amusingly passive, compared
to the more independently spirited Americans.
He thought that the class system had created a race of people who were
scared stiff of authority. On the other hand,
he liked the strong literary tradition of Britain and the fact that education
and artistic/cultural values were generally taken more seriously by the public.
He also, I believe, enjoyed standing out from the crowd, too
– sometimes, when drunk he would bellow in an exaggerated Southern drawl and
play the part of a “dumb American” just for fun and to get a reaction from the timid Brits.
His feelings about his home country were mixed. With many issues, such as gun
control, he felt that he could appreciate both the UK and US point of view – he
could see why the Brits saw public gun ownership as dangerous, but also had a
personal affection for his time spent hunting with his father as a young man
coming of age.
He saw the conservative forces in the US as sinister, however. He was strongly opposed to the Vietnam War,
for instance, and was glad that he got out of the country at that time. He did speak with affection for the US too, its
independent spirit, his Colorado upbringing, its poetry tradition (he maintained
letter contact with some writers, including Ginsberg and Lowell), Hemingway, the Beat writers, etc. but he didn’t
seem in any rush to go back when I knew him. His sister gave
him all the family news he needed from the states and that seemed to be enough for him. If he traveled anywhere outside the UK, it
tended to be Morocco, a hangout for American expat writers in the 20th
Century, including Burroughs.
I would also add that whatever his misgivings about the US, in no way could you ever say that he "went native", despite living in the UK for decades, he always remained very much, an American. He almost acted out a caricature at times, wearing, for instance a “stars ‘n’ stripes” cardigan, that had been knitted for him by a student. But this was his humour – his way of poking fun at the British stereotype of Americans. This was the 1980s, remember, when holidaying in Orlando, New York, and Las Vegas wasn’t as common as it is now, and most Brits only experienced America through TV and movies.
I would also add that whatever his misgivings about the US, in no way could you ever say that he "went native", despite living in the UK for decades, he always remained very much, an American. He almost acted out a caricature at times, wearing, for instance a “stars ‘n’ stripes” cardigan, that had been knitted for him by a student. But this was his humour – his way of poking fun at the British stereotype of Americans. This was the 1980s, remember, when holidaying in Orlando, New York, and Las Vegas wasn’t as common as it is now, and most Brits only experienced America through TV and movies.
Culturally, as I now live in the US, I can appreciate how he
brought American sensibilities to the UK with him, which I didn’t fully
appreciate at the time. He was a very
generous tipper, making him very popular with waitresses, cleaning ladies, bar
staff, taxi drivers, and all other lowly workers, wherever he went. Essentially, he tipped like he was in the
USA, where wages are small for those type of service jobs and tipping happens
all the time, as a pose to the UK where tipping is much rarer (but the wages are
generally higher).
He also refused to walk anywhere. Even if it was ten minutes away. That seemed odd to me when I lived in
Leicester, but again, it is a less uncommon attitude in the US, where the car
is king.
Lyman’s Relationship
with Alcohol
Was Lyman an alcoholic when I knew him? I will leave that for others to judge. He was certainly a heavy drinker and he did
it pretty much every day when I knew him.
He certainly wasn’t a self-pitying or morbid drunk, far from it, he was boisterous
and jovial when intoxicated - but he certainly drank considerable amounts every
day and always ended up seriously drunk.
Like some other creative people, he had a romantic attachment to the
idea of the writer as a heavy drinker and he reveled in the role of the
rebellious provocateur.
I do believe that the drinking had a negative effect on his relationships
and career, however, and more importantly, contributed to his decline as a
creative artist. Lyman also smoked
heavily and took almost no physical exercise (as I mentioned earlier, he would
take taxis everywhere, rather than walk).
As a young student, I found Lyman’s crazy lifestyle
entertaining and exciting, especially when compared with the dusty world of
academia. But it is fair to say that all
the older adults, both within academia and in the arts field that I met who
knew him, even his old friends, generally saw him as an intelligent and gifted
person who had gone seriously off the rails (they would tell you so private). In middle age now myself, my views on Lyman’s
behavior and drinking are somewhat different, and in truth, less favorable to
what they were.
It should be noted, however, that during the exam marking
period, Lyman’s lifestyle changed considerably.
He took a hiatus from the heavy drinking and worked away quietly in his
room, marking student papers. He was a
different man when sober. You could actually
see the responsible, studious man who’d studied at Berkley and King’s College,
London, and the dedicated writer who had produced such excellent poetry when
younger.
He was a flawed man. But his early creativity, his anarchic spirit, his intelligence and
knowledge, his humour, unpretentiousness, and lack of materialism were and remain
big positives for me.